Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Nursing care as a relationship between a subject of care and professional ability to do so requires that the latter understand the experiences that the disease and the treatments generate in the person.
Objective: To establish the qualitative relationship between the qualitative evidence available in scientific literature published between 1997-2014, related to nursing care in patients with peritoneal dialysis nurses taxonomies.
Material and methods: Qualitative study in which with prior authorization from the ethics and research committees, systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted in three stages: 1. Search databases: PubMed, Embase, CUIDEN, CINAHL, Dialnet, Scielo Virtual Library Health and Web of Science. 2. Assessment of methodological quality conducted by independent peers using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, in Spanish; 3. Summary of qualitative evidence, which is interrelated with the taxonomies Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and classification, and Nursing Intervention Classification.
Results: The research paper is based on 19 studies that, using the voice of research subjects reported by the authors and approved with the defining characteristics, allowed the formulation of diagnoses and the determination of the necessary nursing interventions framed in the 13 domains established by the Nursing Diagnoses: definitions and classification. Some of the results and conclusions themselves are qualitative evidence of the care required by people on peritoneal dialysis.
Discussion and conclusions: Peritoneal dialysis interferes in all domains, which goes beyond the subject, affecting their family and environment. Generally it requires lifelong support to achieve adhesion.
Objective: To establish the qualitative relationship between the qualitative evidence available in scientific literature published between 1997-2014, related to nursing care in patients with peritoneal dialysis nurses taxonomies.
Material and methods: Qualitative study in which with prior authorization from the ethics and research committees, systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted in three stages: 1. Search databases: PubMed, Embase, CUIDEN, CINAHL, Dialnet, Scielo Virtual Library Health and Web of Science. 2. Assessment of methodological quality conducted by independent peers using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, in Spanish; 3. Summary of qualitative evidence, which is interrelated with the taxonomies Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and classification, and Nursing Intervention Classification.
Results: The research paper is based on 19 studies that, using the voice of research subjects reported by the authors and approved with the defining characteristics, allowed the formulation of diagnoses and the determination of the necessary nursing interventions framed in the 13 domains established by the Nursing Diagnoses: definitions and classification. Some of the results and conclusions themselves are qualitative evidence of the care required by people on peritoneal dialysis.
Discussion and conclusions: Peritoneal dialysis interferes in all domains, which goes beyond the subject, affecting their family and environment. Generally it requires lifelong support to achieve adhesion.
Keywords
renal replacement therapy
PD
clinical recommendations
nursing
Article Details
License
Author copyright notice
© Authors grant the publisher the non-exclusive licence to publish the work and consent to its use and distribution under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence. Read the licensing information and the legal text here. This must be expressly stated wherever necessary.
How to Cite
1.
Carrillo-Algarra AJ, Duque Salazar N, Nieto Parra KJ. Qualitative evidence and patient care in peritoneal dialysis. Enferm Nefrol [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Apr 30];19(2):[about 10 p.]. Available from: https://www.enfermerianefrologica.com/revista/article/view/4114