Main Article Content

Abstract

Nowadays it is indisputable that kidney transplant is the preferred replacement therapy for patients with chronic kidney disease. In our hospital we carry out basically two types of kidney transplants, the classic brain dead donor and the asystolic donor. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether there were differences in the workload of nursing staff depending on the type of transplant.
This is a transversal study of 73 patients who received a kidney transplant in 2010, 18 of which were from a brain dead donor and 55 from an asystolic donor. The kidney transplants from asystolic donors showed a higher incident of primary graft failure (15% v. 1.4%) and a greater delay in kidney function (18 days v. 0 days). Because of this, our care task was increased in this type of transplant as a greater number of kidney biopsies were required which involve care in preparation and supervision of complications, the need for more haemodialysis session and the administration of a more doses of thymoglobulin. No significant differences were identified in the incidence of infections between the two types of transplant, or in the average hospital stay although the latter could be influenced by the size of the sample.
Despite the complications mentioned above, kidney function in the medium term in both types of transplant was similar, which encourages the use of asystolic donors.

Keywords

kidney transplant asystolic donor brain dead donor nursing care primary graft failure delay in kidney function

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
García Viana MC, Moral Sánchez S, Rodríguez Marcos R, Lope Andrea T, Ridao Cano N. Recipients of kidney transplants from donors in asystole and brain death: differences in nursing care. Enferm Nefrol [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2025 Apr 30];15(1):[about 6 p.]. Available from: https://www.enfermerianefrologica.com/revista/article/view/3331

References

  1. Morales Ruiz E. Trasplante renal anticipado. Guias SEN.Volumen 28. 2008; 3: 123-128.
  2. Lopez-Navidad A., Kulisevsky J., Caballero F. El donante de órganos y tejidos. Springer-Verñag Ibérica, Barcelona 1997; 3: 27.
  3. Ortega F., Arias M., Campistol J.M., Matesanz R., Morales J.M. Trasplante Renal. Médica Panamericana, 2007; 3: 39.
  4. Rampino T, Abelli M, Ticozzelli E, Gregorini M. Nonheart-beating-donor transplant: the first experience in Italy. PMID: 20191461 [PubMed- indexed for Medline] 2010 Jan- Feb; 27(1):56-68 [consultado el 6 de abril de 2011]. Disponible en http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20191461.
  5. Kosieradzki M, Rowinski W. Ischemia/reperfusion injury in kidney transplantation: mechanisms and prevention. PMID: 19100373 [PubMed- indexed for Medline] 2008 Dec; 40(10):32-79-88 [consultado el 6 de abril de 2011]. Disponible en http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19100373.
  6. Sánchez-Fructuoso AI, Prats D, Torrente J, PérezContin MJ, Fernandez C, Álvarez J, Barrientos A. Renal transplantation from non-heart beating donors: a promising alternative to enlarge the donor pool. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 350-358.
  7. Kimber RM, Metcalfe MS, White SA, Nicholson ML. Use of nos-heart-beating donors in renal transplantation. Postgrad Med J 2001;77:681–685.
  8. Gutiérrez-Solís E, Fernández Juárez G. NefroPlus. Junio 2010. 3(1):16-27 [consultado 1 abril de2011]. Disponible en http://www.revistanefrologia.
  9. com/modules.php?name=articulos&idarticulo=10471&idlangart=ES.
  10. Palencia Herrejón E. Trasplante renal de donantes en asistolia. Revista
  11. electrónica de medicina intensiva. Julio 2002. Art 418. Vol 2 nº 7[consultado 2 abril de 2011]. Disponible en http://remi.uninet.edu/2002/07/REMI0418.htm.
  12. Andreu Periz L, Force Sanmartin E. La enfermería y el trasplante de órganos. Médica Panamericana, 2004; 2: 22.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.